%Aigaion2 BibTeX export from IfE Document Management System
%Monday 21 May 2012 09:59:48 AM

@INPROCEEDINGS{Calatroni2011_SMC,
     author = {Calatroni, Alberto and Roggen, Daniel and Tr{\"{o}}ster, Gerhard},
   keywords = {Activity Recognition, data collection, data curation, data synchronization, labeling, OPPORTUNITY},
      month = oct,
      title = {Collection and curation of a large reference dataset for activity recognition},
  booktitle = {Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011 IEEE International Conference on},
       year = {2011},
      pages = {30 -35},
       issn = {1062-922X},
        doi = {10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083638},
   abstract = {The field of research on activity recognition is relatively young compared to others, like computer vision. In more mature fields, algorithms are usually tested on standardized, reference datasets. This way, algorithms coming from different groups can be tested in a fair manner, which accelerates the process of developing new knowledge. Collecting a reference dataset under realistic settings for activity recognition poses many challenges due to the large amount of sensors and sensor modalities which are needed to provide a sufficiently complete playground. We here report on some lessons learned while collecting such a reference dataset with a heterogeneous setup. We argue for the importance of a few principles to obtain a clean dataset, starting from the sampling and acquisition, down to the synchronization and labeling of the data.}
}